Samsung Galaxy S5 appears in AnTuTu benchmark with a Snapdragon 800 CPU

David Parker December 21, 2013 4

[adsads2resp]?

The rumoured Samsung SM-G900F has now found its way to the AnTuTu’s benchmark database. AnTuTu team seems “almost sure” that this device which has been spotted on their benchmarks is the anticipated international variant of the upcoming Galaxy S5.

Antutu’s findings on the device can be summarised with the below specs:

  • Powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 CPU
  • Krait 400 processor that is clocked at 2.5GHz
  • Comes with an Adreno 330 GPU
  • Packs 3 GB of RAM and 32 GB of internal storage
  • A 16 MP main camera (likely to have the ISOCELL unit)
  • A  2 MP front-facing sensor
  • Runs on Android 4.4 KitKat

Snapdragon 800 series can run at frequencies of up to 2.5 GHz. Galaxy S5 has been clocked at 2.5 GHz instead of 2.3 GHz – Now, there is only one official device with this chipset version which is Gionee ELIFE E7 ( a Chinese handset) that is yet to be released.

sm-g900f-antutu

[adsads1resp]?

One important finding that is quite contrary to our expectations is; the screen resolution stands at 1,920×1,080 pixels instead of 2,650×1,440. This probably indicates that it may be a test device or a prototype which is being used by Samsung for testing at the standard 1080p display. It’s also possible that the 2K display may not be ready yet use.

Samsung’s previously announced ISOCELL technology may also find its way to their next flagship which is most likely to be the Galaxy S5.

With these finding we are closer to being convinced that the rumoured Samsung SM-G900F is in fact the Galaxy S5. At this stage part from the ‘type of screen’ the rest of the specs seem accurate enough.

We shall know for sure in a few weeks time. Till then, lets us wait till early next year, by around January, when the Galaxy S5 is rumoured to be announced.

What are your views on SM-G900F (Galaxy S5) from Samsung? What are your expectations from this device? Do write to us with your views in the comments section provided below.

Recommended Products

 

4 Comments »

  1. bob  December 21, 2013 at 7:28 pm - Reply

    Where’s the evidence to back up the speculation on the adreno 420?

    • David Parker
      David Parker  December 22, 2013 at 2:44 am - Reply

      We had inadvertently mentioned Adreno 420 instead of Adreno 330 in the article. The typo has been corrected. Thanks Bob!

  2. sagar  December 22, 2013 at 2:24 am - Reply

    u r right bob..
    its seems to be a typo,
    it should be adreno 330 bcoz 420 is not a part of snapdragon 800

  3. jare  December 22, 2013 at 12:21 pm - Reply

    any1 know what gs5 will be made out of

Leave a Response»

css.php